Monthly Archives: April 2009

Dude, Where’s My Stall?

Missing Parking StallA condo owner had been moved out of his unit a few months before finally deciding to sell it.  He went to the unit to check on it and as he pulled into the condo’s underground parkade, he saw that all the parking stalls had been repainted & renumbered.    He then discovered that one of his two underground parking stalls had been literally erased.

I don’t know whether he was later able to reclaim that 2nd parking stall underground or if it was relocated to an outside stall – the reason being that the parking stalls in that particular condominium were assigned and not titled or leased.

This is important to know when considering a condo purchase.   Here in Alberta, there are three ways of distributing exclusive use of parking to owners:

1)  Assigned Parking:  An assigned parking stall can be relocated by the Board of Directors whenever needed.  Again, assignments are at the discretion of the board and can change at any time. 

2)  Titled Parking:  You actually own the parking stall, it has its own title, and is issued separately from the residential unit.  The parking unit is designated a legal unit number and a unit factor on the Condo Plan.  In some cases, the parking unit will be shown on a Condominium Plan as part of the unit.   When this happens, the Unit sizes are larger because the registered area of these Units include parking  (See my blog article:  Registered Size vs Total Living Area )

3)  Leased Parking.  There are two forms:

  • Leased Parking-Delineated.  If the Condo Plan shows areas of common property that can be leased,  (usually illustrated with dotted lines and identifying numbers) it can transfer with the sale of the Unit without the Condo Board needing to grant approval.  This type of Leased Parking can be as valuable as a titled parking stall.
  • Leased Parking-Not Delineated.   If the Condo Plan only shows areas of common property and each parking stall cannot be identified, these types of leases are only valid while the owner holds ownership.  When they sell the Unit, the lease to the parking space terminates.  The new buyer would have to renegotiate the lease with the Condominium Corporation.

Related News Article

Condo Parking – Global TV Story

 Buying or selling a condo?  Feel free to contact me.

-

Mike Fotiou, First Place Realty, is Certified Condominium Specialist

Lawyer’s Corner: Cash Back Deals

Cash Back dealsLou Pesta, Q.C., writes: A new development in the market has come to my attention recently. Twice in the past couple of weeks, I have been approached by buyers with purchase contracts (with different developers) where the price was inflated by $40,000 to $50,000 to show a higher price on the face of the agreement. In the portion of the contract showing how the price is paid, there is a corresponding “cash back” on closing provision.

Why is this happening? Developers may want to create the illusion that the new home market is not in distress or they may want to give the impression that they are not undercutting their competitors. While this is not mortgage fraud because it is transparent on the face of the agreement (i.e. it’s not a side deal), it nevertheless creates several significant problems that made me advise the buyers not to execute the agreements. I certainly would not be prepared to act on the transaction.

Here are the problems from the buyer’s perspective:

  • The property taxes will be inflated for years and the buyer will not be able to appeal the tax assessment
     
  • On the GST rebate application (if applicable), there are declarations that the application reflects the true purchase price paid. To complete the application in these circumstances would likely constitute fraud
     
  • In recognition of the GST rebate problem, the developers in these circumstances are not giving the buyer a “net of GST rebate” price but instead requiring the buyer to apply for the GST rebate refund to the government
     
  • On submitting the transfer of land to Land Titles, the buyer is required to execute an affidavit of value, based on what the buyer believes the property would be likely to sell for on the open market. Land Titles will not accept a valuation of less than the purchase price reflected on the face of the transfer of land. If the buyer swears that the purchase price reflects true value, then once again, the buyer is likely committing perjury.  
       

Lubos K. Pesta, Q.C.
Walsh Wilkins Creighton LLP
Phone: 403.267.8432 Fax: 403.264.9400
lpesta@wwclawyers.com

   
Copyright Alberta Real Estate Association. Reprinted with permission. AREA makes no guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. The comments expressed in these articles are for information purposes only and serve to highlight general principles. Each situation s different and you should seek legal counsel before pursuing any particular course of action.

Lawyer’s Corner: Backing Out of Construction Contracts

Signing ContractLou Pesta, Q.C., writes:  A number of large condominium projects are nearing completion in Calgary and elsewhere in the province. With the current economic downturn, both REALTORS®  and buyers are asking about the consequences of not completing a new condominium purchase. Since this is a complicated area of law and several remedies including specific performance, forfeiture of deposits and damages may be available to the developer, you are strongly urged to refer these types of questions to a solicitor.

For the purposes of dispelling some common misconceptions only, this article is going to address some of the consequences of a buyer reneging on a binding contract of this type. First of all, it should be noted that condominium construction/purchase agreements are typically tailor-made by the developer’s solicitors to represent the best interests of the developer. As such, they rarely allow the buyer not to complete the purchase even if, in the buyer’s opinion, there have been excessive delays in the construction of the project or if the buyer believes there have been some other breaches of the developer’s obligations.

If the buyer unilaterally elects not to complete the transaction, then some of the agreements will allow the developer to “accelerate” the payment of the balance of the purchase price and/or keep any and all funds paid by the buyer to the date of default. Moreover, the developer is rarely limited by the agreement to accepting the forfeited deposits as a genuine pre-estimate of the damages. Usually a cause of action for additional losses (damages) is available against the buyer. These losses can be quite substantial in a buyer’s market, such as we are experiencing presently, where prices are declining. It may take the developer some time to resell the property to another buyer for a reasonable price.

The recoverable damages could include any or all of the following:

  • loss of resale value (provided that the builder acts reasonably to “mitigate” the loss)
  • extra advertising expenses
  • legal costs incurred by the developer arising from the default
  • extra real estate commissions paid
  • all carrying costs for the time period from the original closing date to the ultimate re-sale date

In conclusion, a buyer should never be advised that they can walk away from a construction agreement and simply lose the deposits paid on the transaction to date. In most instances, where possible, it will be better for the buyer to complete the purchase and either rent or re-sell the property themselves in order to minimize the financial losses suffered.

If it is not possible for the buyer to complete the purchase due to circumstances beyond the buyer’s control, such as the revocation of the mortgage commitment due to declining market values or loss of the buyer’s employment, then the buyer should attempt to negotiate a settlement with the builder. Although not obligated to do so, the builder might reduce the purchase price to allow the transaction to close or agree to fixed compensation for the loss of the sale.

Lubos K. Pesta, Q.C.
Walsh Wilkins Creighton LLP
Phone: 403.267.8432 Fax: 403.264.9400
lpesta@wwclawyers.com

-

Next on Lawyer’s Corner:  What You Need to Know About Cash Back Deals

 

Copyright Alberta Real Estate Association. Reprinted with permission. AREA makes no guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. The comments expressed in these articles are for information purposes only and serve to highlight general principles. Each situation s different and you should seek legal counsel before pursuing any particular course of action.

March 2009 – Calgary Real Estate in Review

For the first time since September SFH sales broke through the 1,000 mark, registering 1086 sales.   Condos also recorded the most sales since September with a total of 446.

This is a marked increase over February’s numbers – SFH sales are up 32% while Condos are up 30%.  Again, as has been the case for the past several months, these month-over-month increases need to be tempered by comparing them to last years numbers: SFH sales were down 23% from last March when 1418 changed hands, and Condos were down 21% from 565 sales.     This increase in activity from the dismal end of 2008 and early 2009 is certainly a positive development but it is to be expected as the spring months always garner more sales.

Metro-Calgary SFH Sales

Metro-Calgary SFH Sales

The condo market segment experienced an uptick in the average and median price over last month. The average price of a condo in metro-Calgary was $284,056, up from the $268,971 of February – a 6% increase.  Year-over-year, the average was still down 9% from $312,620.   The median price was up 4% from February to $260k, but again down from last year by 11%.
Metro-Calgary Condo Prices

Metro-Calgary Condo Prices

Prices for SFH’s remained static for the month, with the median holding steady at $375k.   This is a decrease of 11% from March 2008 when the median was $420k.   The average price gained 1% over February, thanks in part to 18 $1million+ sales in the month.  (Last March, there were 38 $1million+ sales)   Again, year-over-year the average was down 11% from $474,513.

Metro-Calgary SFH Prices

Metro-Calgary SFH Prices

Where have all the listings gone?   March 2008 had a SFH month-end inventory of 5,957.   We’re currently down almost 27% since then, having 4,369 active listings at month’s end.  The same is true for Condos where inventory is down 26% from last March, from 2781 to 2052.

Vacant/New Construction listings are also down substantially year-over-year.  SFH are down to 1102 from 1616, and Condos are down to 707 from 1038.

SFH Month-end Inventory

SFH Month-end Inventory

Absorption rates also improved - SFH’s now have an absorption rate of 4.0, the most balanced its been since February 2008.  Condos are at a 4.6 month absorption rate, the most balanced since last February as well.  According to past CREB Inventory Absorption charts, a balanced market is achieved between 2 - 3.5 months supply. The CREB March release for some reason shows it as up to 4 months right now, but I’ll continue to have it as up to 3.5 months since that’s how its been up until now.

Metro-Calgary Absorption Rate

Metro-Calgary Absorption Rate

Long-term March Comparisons

Long-term March Comparisons